Tuesday, November 5, 2013

The Future Of Wine Labeling In The U. S.

We have heard for a long time the involvement of the FDA in nutritional labeling practices for food. Up until now, they have excluded alcoholic beverages from the same criteria of labeling as food. It has recently made the announcement that it will allow for nutritional labeling to be included on alcoholic beverages. These changes were brought about in part because of the liquor mogul Beam Global. In order to prove their Skinnygirl Brand of Wines, actually contains just 100 calories, instead of the normal 110 or more for each 5 oz. serving, they have to be able to include the ingredients. Though this is an action not supported by other alcohol bottlers, it will be voluntary to begin with. Most non-supporters are concerned this is the first step towards mandatory label requirements.

The alcohol laws in the U.S. are still reflecting a lack of oversight from the years of alcohol being banned. The unquestionably unequal law is obvious. An example is today, if you sell “food” such as a fruit flavored drink, you have to list the ingredients as well as the nutritional information. But if you use that same fruit to make an alcoholic beverage, you are then subject to regulations of the Alcohol & Tobacco Tax & Trade Bureau.

With the lack of participation in this process, consumers have stood to ask the questions like “Does this beverage contain GMO’s or Animal Products?” Currently, it is just a guessing game to figure out if their beers are vegan enough or GMO free enough to purchase. Smaller specialty brewers are trustworthy and are locally available.

When it comes to Wine, it has not been excluded from the discussion either. Whether outrageously expensive or the bottle on the refrigerator shelf at the local wine store, it could contain up to 200 different additives. That is the number the U.S. currently sets as a limit for any additives in the wine produced here.
Winemakers who see the importance of “real ingredient” labeling, are in front of the efforts to get the wine and alcohol producers to see the value as well. 

Randall Graham-Founder of Bonny Doon has listed everything on his labels since 2007. Even something as minor as water was listed. Another leader in the labeling movement is Paul Draper. He is a famed minimalist Winemaker, who also believes ingredients should be on the bottles of wine. These two are just a small percentage of the growing support for this type of transparency. It would appear consumer support is positive as well.

It is not a consensus however. Adding extras to the manufacturing of products in this market are a normal process that hides a multitude of mistakes and adds flavoring not retained in the finish product, normally. It is reasonable to see why this would be the case. So many of the additives are toxic on their own and that couldn’t be the best news to publicize. 

Real Ingredient Labeling for alcoholic beverages is something that is trying to catch up with today’s standards. Until recently, most people have not been concerned about the ingredients in their alcohol, but that has started to change as well. Today’s consumer is smarter and more concerned with what’s in their food & drinks. With this new train of thought, it is inevitable for better labeling practices to be ignored. 

The reward for this thinking will filter throughout the industry with wineries for taking more care in providing additive free or additive limited products. Consumers will buy more beverages that are labeled with “real ingredient” information. There will also be a reward to the label manufacturing market. Their involvement in this transition is critical to the excellence expected in the future. Changing both the details of the labels and the sizing requirements will require skilled companies who specialize in food or beverage labeling, to get even more involved in their wine and alcohol manufacturers planning process.  

Authorized for reprint by Rose Richmond by Labels Fort Worth

No comments:

Post a Comment